Notice to the Executive,
Since the Global Financial Crisis began in 2007, I have studied the global financial system and the “laws” of commerce in detail, and I conclude that “the system” is briefly as follows:
1/ Money: All bills of exchange are a “promise to pay”. A cheque is to “pay” someone “or bearer”. Cash money of exchange is “legal tender for”. These instruments have no intrinsic value, and nowhere is it stated on them exactly what will be paid? But clearly there is something of value that passes between people, something essential which they use to create their goods and services. So what is it? I have concluded that the only true value in commerce is “human energy”, backed by Nature. This value can be described as actual, innate credit, or “money of origin”, or “original issue money”, because it generates within living people. It is a life force of electricity, which is “transferred” or “transmitted” when it is “charged” or “discharged”, and which circulates as “currency”. I conclude that the source of money is human energy, and therefore “money” is “power”.
2/ Bank “loans”: Banks pretend to issue credit to people because people already have human energy as credit. When someone goes to a bank they take their credit, and when they sign a Promissory Note they “extend credit” to the bank, which treats their Note as cash. The bank records their note as an asset (credit) to the bank on the bank’s accounts receivable side of the ledger, while the bank records their note as a liability (debt) to the bank on the accounts payable side of the ledger. If the Originator of the note registers as the legal Secured Party Creditor to the note, they can claim recoupment as the maker/drawer. However, if the Originator of the note does not register as the the Secured Party Creditor to the note in the public domain, the note is unclaimed and the bank considers it abandoned property, whereupon it sells the note as a security (securitisation). In this case, the alleged “borrower” unwittingly forfeits their property and is charged for the principal plus interest! This fraud has been replicated via the global central banking system, through which the international bankers have deceitfully captured the innate credit of the people of every IMF member state. I conclude that bank “loans” are fraud, and that sovereign people and governments should not “borrow” but “issue”.
3/ Interest: All human interaction is commerce involving the exchange of human energy as innate credit. Exchange systems can be small (family) or large (national). These are “living economies”. Sometimes people cannot interact directly, so a medium of exchange that represents human energy is convenient. It makes no difference what this “money” is, because as a system representing energy it could be a shell, a “tally stick”, or just a written record with numbers. Whatever the medium is, it is simply a convenient method of accounting, and its representative value is protected simply by the control of its quantity in circulation to assure sufficient healthy trade. This “money” has no intrinsic value and is unable to multiply of itself. In other words, “money” cannot breed like livestock, or be dug out of the ground like gold and silver. Hence, all interest, which is the pretence of creating money from money, is a perverse corruption of the medium of exchange. I conclude that interest is a scam.
4/ Interest-Bearing-Debt: Interest extracts unearned income, with disastrous consequences. Since the system is debt-based, and interest is not created by the “loan”, more debt is needed in aggregate to service debt, and so on. The rate of growth of debt must be higher than the rate of growth of earned income to keep the system functioning. Debt grows exponentially, exhausting all human and natural “resources”. “Wealth” and assets of all kinds flow upward from the net “borrowers” to the net “lenders”. I conclude that interest-bearing debt is toxic to living economies and, if not purged, will destroy any society.
5/ Bankruptcy: The Great Depression was caused by market manipulation intended to precipitate the foreclosure of indebted nations, capturing wealth and power. Consequently, due to the pending bankruptcy in 1933, all privately held gold coins and bullion in America were seized via Executive Order on April 5, 1933, to benefit the false “creditor”, the private Federal Reserve Corporation under the terms of the bankruptcy. Congress – still convening strictly under Executive Order authority – confirmed the bankruptcy through the Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause, June 5, 1933, House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192, June 5, 1933, 73rd Congress, 1st Session, Public Law 73-10. Obviously, a nation that is bankrupt, albeit falsely, is vulnerable to foreclosure by the banks. Since 1933, every central bank nation has inherited the ignominy of lost sovereignty. I conclude that every central bank government, is technically, or effectively, trading in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, and using “bankruptcy scrip” in a debt-money system.
6/ Governments: Originally, freely-elected de jure constitutional governments were created by the people to serve, not rule. Such a government is unincorporated in Common Law, and constitutes a Public Trust, whose employees are Public Servants accountable to the people, whereby a nation’s sovereignty resides in the people, whose power is the source of Law. But financial and political coercion has gradually converted formerly de jure nations into de facto incorporated entities with central banks. The dissolution of the united States Congress in 1861 compelled President Lincoln to impose Marshal Law. Subsequently, the privately-owned “Congress” formed a corporate Government for the “District of Columbia” on February 21, 1871 (Chapter 62, 16 Stat. 419), which was reorganised on June 11, 1878 (Chapter 180, 20 Stat. 102) and re-named “United States Government.” The Federal Reserve Act 1913, the bankruptcy events of 1933, and the Bretton Woods agreements of 1944, strengthened and expanded the corporatised nations. Participating governments prepare annual filings for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, where every central bank nation is registered as a company. It appears that the international accounting system is the C.A.F.R. (Comprehensive Annual Financial Report). I conclude that all central bank nations, and every department therein, including the courts and the police, are incorporated entities engaged in commerce, serving the financial powers.
7/ Secured Party Creditor: The 1933 “bankruptcy scrip” was issued in return for Government obligations. Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session, stated that “Under the new law, the money is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and bankers acceptances. The money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” As a result, the real property, wealth, assets and productive labour of the people was henceforward pledged by the Government as a Surety against the corporate national debt. This was a process of hypothecation by stealth, using the people’s “commercial value”, without their consent, as collateral for the State. This “credit of the nation” has become the Surety for trade within and between all central bank nations, which collectively serve the banking administrators.
Banking. Offer of stocks, bonds, or other assets owned by a party other than the borrower as collateral for a loan, without transferring title. If the borrower turns the property over to the lender who holds it for safekeeping, the action is referred to as a pledge. If the borrower retains possession, but gives the lender the right to sell the property in event of default, it is a true hypothecation.
Securities. The pledging of negotiable securities to collateralize a broker’s margin loan. The broker pledges the same securities to a bank as collateral for a broker’s loan, the process is referred to as re-hypothecation.’
[Dictionary Of Banking Terms, Fitch, pg. 228 (1997)]
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading [Birth Certificate] to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” [Colonel Edward Mandell House to Woodrow Wilson (President 1913-1921)]
I conclude that every living man or woman who is a registered member of a nation’s legal society, is in fact a Guarantor of Surety for that nation, being a Secured Party Creditor.
8/ Birth Certificate: Governments have no rights over living people without their consent, (because that which is created by the people cannot be greater than the people), so the 1933 “New Deal” required a legal device to gain jurisdiction over the commercial value of the people. That device is registration, with which a man or a woman can be contracted (subject to their consent which can be silence) to become collateral for the State. When a child is born, the hospital sends the original of the “record of live birth” (not a copy) to the government, which uses it to create a Birth Certificate Bond in the corrupted all-capital-letters version of the baby’s true given name plus family name, i.e. JOHN DOE. The Birth Certificate Bond is registered as a Security, which the Treasury uses as Surety for new Treasury securities such as Treasury Bonds, Notes and Bills. Thus, the commercial value of the living human, via the all-capital-letters legal person name on the Birth Certificate, becomes a Surety for the State. The artificial legal person, a legal device originally used in commerce for contracting with consent, has been corrupted via the Birth Certificate, creating a “straw man”.
Straw man. A “front”; a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct respecting the property. Person who purchases property, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p 1421]
cer-tif-i-cate, noun. Middle English certificate, from Middle French, from Medieval Latin ceruficatum. from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare, to certify, 15th century. 3: a document evidencing ownership or debt. [Merriam Webster Dictionary (1998)]
Security. I a: Something (as a mortgage or collateral) that is provided to make certain the fulfillment of an obligation. Example: used his property as security for a loan. lb: “surety.” 2: Evidence of indebtedness, ownership, or the right to ownership. — Ibid.
Bond. I a: A usually formal written agreement by which a person undertakes to perform a certain act (as fulfill the obligations of a contract). … with the condition that failure to perform or abstain will obligate the person … to pay a sum of money or will result in the forfeiture of money put up by the person or surety. 1b: One who acts as a surety. 2: An interest-bearing document giving evidence of a debt issued by a government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a lien on property and is often designed to take care of a particular financial need. — Ibid.
Surety. The person who has pledged him or herself to pay back money or perform a certain action if the principal to a contract fails, as collateral, and as part of the original contract. [Duhaime’s Law Dictionary]
1: a formal engagement (as a pledge) given for the fulfillment of an undertaking.
2: one who promises to answer for the debt or default of another.
Under the Uniform Commercial Code, however, a surety includes a guarantor, and the two terms are generally interchangeable.
[Merriam Webster’s “Dictionary of Law” (1996)]
Guarantor. A person who pledges collateral for the contract of another, but separately, as part of an independent contract with the obligee of the original contract. [Duhaime’s Law Dictionary]
I conclude that the registration of birth, which creates the Birth Certificate, converts the lawful and true name of the child, into a legal, juristic name of a “legal person” “straw man”, so that the State can obtain legal title, commercial Surety, and jurisdiction thereby.
9/ Lawful: Common Law (Law of the Land) still applies in New Zealand, as confirmed in the Imperial Laws Applications Act, 1988. The Common Law contains the precepts of “right and wrong” and “justice”, and holds that a man or a woman should live honourably, hurt nobody, deceive nobody, and render to everyone his or her due. Such laws are Common Sense for Men and Women, who are also subject to Natural Laws. The proper venue of “justice” for a lawful Man/Woman (one not “acting” as a legal entity) is a Constitutionally sanctioned common-law-venue-court with a jury of one’s peers. However, the Judiciary is comprised of a “Commercial List” Judges who primarily adjudicate in the profitable commercial statutory courts. So when a man or a woman makes a request to a Judge to convene a court de jure, refusal is the usual response. This is a breach of the Judge’s oath of office to uphold the Common Law, which is contempt of court. I conclude that the Common Law court de jure is the only venue of “justice” for a living man or woman, and a lawful Right, which is usually denied.
10/ Legal: Statutory “Law”, or Admiralty Maritime Commercial (Law of the Sea), contains the codes, rules, and regulations of a nation’s legal commerce. The U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code) is the international codification, without which reliable international trade would not be possible through contracts. The Law Merchant adopts the doctrines of the Common Law in regard to the essentials of Contract Law. Incorporated governments and their franchise creations, including the “person”, are also contract-based. Statutes are not “laws” but contract instruments that provide governance by consent. “Persons” as creations of the state are bound by statutes. The deception of the “legal person” has been used to extract commercial value from the people. Statutory courts are commercial “administrative courts”. Any court without a jury present is an “administrative court” and unlawful. ‘The law is absolutely clear on this subject. There is no authority for administrative courts in this country, and no Act can be passed to legitimise them.’ – Halsbury’s Law 2011. Nationally, everything legal is created by government Legislation for the purpose of governing commercial legal “persons” of every artificial kind. The rules and regulations of Statutory “Law” cannot possibly apply to living Men and Women, unless by consent, because that which is created by living Men and Women cannot be greater in standing that its creators. Therefore, all government statutes are subject to the “free and genuine” consent of the governed, and can only carry the “colour of law”, or the “force of law”.
Maxim of Law: Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent.
I conclude that Statutes only apply to a Man or Woman who consents to “act” in “joinder” to a legal “person” ens legis, such that a Statutory court de facto is not for a living Man or Woman sui juris.
11/ Joinder: Since the “New Deal” became the modus operandi of the central banking system post-WW2, the only “assets” used by member governments to “settle” fraudulent debt obligations to the international bankers, have been the blood, sweat, and tears of every man and woman “acting” as a “legal person” with a Birth Certificate and a Social Security/IRD account number etc. Their future labour and tax revenues have been legally “pledged” via the all-capital-letters, juristic-person names appearing on the Birth Certificates, i.e. the Securities used as collateral for loans of false “credit” to pay the daily operational costs of the government, including the interest on the ever-increasing, and wholly fraudulent corporate national debt. I conclude that every living man or woman who “acts” as an “accommodation party” to an artificial legal “person” invokes “joinder” and is thereby commercially exploited via a fiction.
12/ True Payment: The private means of true payment was withdrawn on June 5, 1933, after which the people were obliged to use banker’s debt-money. Subsequently, on August 15, 1971, Richard Nixon closed “the gold window”, ending the ability of central bank nations to be paid for debt in gold. Therefore, since 1971, it has been impossible to pay our collective debts within the international debt-based system. Obviously, a debt cannot be paid with another debt. Moreover, every time we try to do so, we increase our liability as Guarantors by compounding the debt. But the 1933 action could not be lawful under Contract Law unless a remedy was provided for true payment not using “bankruptcy scrip”. Such payment can only be made by the living Guarantor, the Man or Woman. The payment remedy is an “Acceptance” process by which the Guarantor, as Authorised Representative or Agent, accepts for value a contract offer (presentment) requesting some of their innate credit as accounted for in the “prepaid” Direct Treasury account. The administrative commercial guidelines are prescribed in the U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code), with the oversight of the I.A.C.A. (International Association of Commercial Administrators). I conclude that the detachable remittance of a legal “statement of account” is the formative “cheque” for an “acceptance” and therefore the provision for “set-off” or “discharge” allowing true payment.
Finally, I conclude that “the system” is a social construct of the mind, an artificial creation, which, because of the human condition, profoundly impacts the real lives of people. Religion, money, and legislation are belief systems. The only true Law is that which governs Life and therefore is above humanity.
We are all created as equal Sovereigns with Unalienable Rights, Responsibilities and Credit. The de jure constitutional state reflects these principles but has been corrupted beyond recognition. Such a state would function relatively well if governments served as accountable Public Trusts, if the legal society mirrored the justice of Common Law, and if sovereign nations issued sovereign money debt-free and interest-free as is their prerogative, serving the free sovereign and independent people.
Instead, tyranny has blackened our world with poverty, pain, destruction and death. All forms of political dialogue and mass media have become a means of further indoctrination and distraction, supporting a global parasitic hegemony that is laying waste to humanity and our living Earth. Resistance to this tyranny is becoming a revolutionary act increasingly met by the corrupted “force of law”, under a deadly multinational post-capitalist order of “privatised profit” and “socialised debt”.
Therefore, I conclude that to survive, we must evolve.
Please consider my conclusions 1-12, and explain to me in an Affidavit why I am in error, with as much evidence and fact as can be supplied, in order to fully rebut my conclusions point-by-point. Otherwise, if you do not respond, we are in agreement that my conclusions are true, and that you and the entire Executive are committing treason against the People of this nation, for which you are fully liable in your private capacity in Law.
Yours in honour,
John: Doe, sui juris